|
|
|
| Registros recuperados: 27 | |
|
|
| Krause, Gesche; Brugere, Cecile; Diedrich, Amy; Ebeling, Michael W.; Ferse, Sebastian C. A.; Mikkelsen, Eirik; Perez, Jose; Stead, Selina M.; Stybel, Nardine; Troell, Max. |
| Tipo: Text |
Palavras-chave: Aquaculture; Socio-economic assessment; Human dimensions; Integrated analysis framework; Public participation. |
| Ano: 2015 |
URL: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00252/36301/34830.pdf |
| |
|
|
| Huitema, Dave; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - Institute for Environmental Studies; dave.huitema@ivm.vu.nl; Mostert, Erik; Delft University of Technology - Centre for River Basin Administration; E.Mostert@TUDelft.NL; Egas, Wouter; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - Institute for Environmental Studies; wouter.egas@ivm.vu.nl; Yalcin, Resul; University of Bonn - Center for Development Research; ryalcin@uni-bonn.de. |
| This article assesses the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-)management based on a literature review of the (water) governance literature. The adaptive (co-)management literature contains four institutional prescriptions: collaboration in a polycentric governance system, public participation, an experimental approach to resource management, and management at the bioregional scale. These prescriptions largely resonate with the theoretical and empirical insights embedded in the (water) governance literature. However, this literature also predicts various problems. In particular, attention is called to the complexities associated with participation and collaboration, the difficulty of experimenting in a real-world setting, and the politicized nature... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive governance; Bioregional perspective; Experimentation; Polycentric governance; Public participation; Water management. |
| Ano: 2009 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| CUNHA,DAVI G.F.; MARQUES,JONATAS F.; RESENDE,JULIANA C. DE; FALCO,PATRÍCIA B. DE; SOUZA,CHRISLAINE M. DE; LOISELLE,STEVEN A.. |
| ABSTRACT The potential impacts of citizen science initiatives are increasing across the globe, albeit in an imbalanced manner. In general, there is a strong element of trial and error in most projects, and the comparison of best practices and project structure between different initiatives remains difficult. In Brazil, the participation of volunteers in environmental research is limited. Identifying the factors related to citizen science projects’ success and longevity within a global perspective can contribute for consolidating such practices in the country. In this study, we explore past and present projects, including a case study in Brazil, to identify the spatial and temporal trends of citizen science programs as well as their best practices and... |
| Tipo: Info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Palavras-chave: Citizen science; Community-based monitoring; Environmental management; Public participation; Volunteer data collection. |
| Ano: 2017 |
URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652017000502229 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Mees, Hannelore; Research Group Environment and Society, University of Antwerp; hannelore.mees@uantwerpen.be; Alexander, Meghan; Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University ; m.c.alexander@mdx.ac.uk; Kaufmann, Maria; Institute for Management Research, Radboud University Nijmegen; m.kaufmann@fm.ru.nl; Bruzzone, Silvia; CITERES Research Centre, François Rabelais University of Tours; silvia.bruzzone@enpc.fr; Lewandowski, Jakub; Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Science; jakub.lewandowski22@gmail.com. |
| Across Europe, citizens are increasingly expected to participate in the implementation of flood risk management (FRM), by engaging in voluntary-based activities to enhance preparedness, implementing property-level measures, and so forth. Although citizen participation in FRM decision making is widely addressed in academic literature, citizens’ involvement in the delivery of FRM measures is comparatively understudied. Drawing from public administration literature, we adopted the notion of “coproduction” as an analytical framework for studying the interaction between citizens and public authorities, from the decision-making process through to the implementation of FRM in practice. We considered to what extent coproduction is... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Codelivery; Coproduction; Cross-country comparison; Flood risk governance; Flood risk responsibilities; Legitimacy; Public participation; Resilience. |
| Ano: 2016 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Toupal, Rebecca S; University of Arizona; rst@u.arizona.edu. |
| Multicultural demands on public lands in the United States continue to challenge federal land managers to address social and cultural concerns in their planning efforts. Specifically, they lack adequate knowledge of cultural concerns, as well as a consistent strategy for acquiring that knowledge for use in decision-making. Current federal approaches to understanding such issues as access, use, and control of resources include public participation, conservation partnerships, government-to-government consultations with American Indian tribes, cultural resource inventories, and landscape analysis. Given that cultural knowledge arises from human–nature relationships and shared perceptions of natural environments, and that landscapes are the ultimate... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: American Indians; Cultural landscapes; Ethnographic data; Landscape perceptions; Natural resource management; Public participation. |
| Ano: 2003 |
|
| |
|
|
| Wilson, James D.. |
| How "default options" should be used in health risk assessment divides the risk analysis profession. Some argue that these should be "hard": set by policy, generally biased to be "health protective" and requiring a substantial body of evidence to replace by decision-specific alternatives. Others argue that they should be science-based, identified by consensus of the professional community, replaced by whatever decision-specific information may be available to the analyst. This paper shows that both positions have validity, and that both are incomplete. Each kind of construct has a useful role to play, but in different kinds of decisions. Because the two are different, we suggest giving them different names, "default option" being assigned to the... |
| Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper |
Palavras-chave: Risk; Regulation; Decision making; Default options; EPA; FDA; Science; Policy; Public participation; Risk analysis; Risk and Uncertainty. |
| Ano: 1998 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/10712 |
| |
|
|
| Beierle, Thomas C.. |
| Of all recent efforts to transform the federal bureaucracy through the use of information technology, electronic rulemaking holds the most potential for enhancing the role of the public in policymaking. In its more expansive formulation, electronic rulemaking would allow citizens to learn about proposed regulations on the Web, comment on them electronically, read comments by others, and even discuss relevant issues with fellow citizens and agency staff. This paper outlines what we should expect from public involvement in electronic rulemaking, concluding that its promise lies in embedding democratic deliberation into administrative decision-making. The current move to put rulemaking dockets online, while important, is likely to fall short of electronic... |
| Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper |
Palavras-chave: Rulemaking; Public participation; Electronic democracy; Electronic dockets; Deliberation; E-government; Political Economy. |
| Ano: 2003 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/10681 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Beierle, Thomas C.; Cayford, Jerry. |
| Public participation has become an integral part of environmental policymaking. Dispute resolution-with its focus on deliberation, problem solving, and consensus seeking among a small group of people-is one of the alternatives decision-makers increasingly turn to for involving the public. This paper evaluates dispute resolution as a form of public participation by measuring its success against five "social goals": incorporating public values into decisions, increasing the substantive quality of decisions, resolving conflict, building trust, and educating the public. The data for the analysis come from a "case survey," in which researchers read and coded information on more than 100 attributes of 239 published case studies of public involvement in... |
| Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper |
Palavras-chave: Dispute resolution; Public participation; Conflict resolution; Evaluation; Institutional and Behavioral Economics. |
| Ano: 2001 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/10899 |
| |
|
|
| von Korff, Yorck; Lisode; Cemagref / Irstea UMR G-EAU; yorck.von-korff@lisode.com; Daniell, Katherine A; The Australian National University; Cemagref / Irstea UMR G-EAU; k.a.daniell@gmail.com; Moellenkamp, Sabine; University of Osnabrueck; sabine.moellenkamp@gmx.de; Bots, Pieter; Delft University of Technology; p.w.g.bots@tudelft.nl; Bijlsma, Rianne M; University of Twente; Deltares; r.m.bredenhoff@gmail.com. |
| Many current water planning and management problems are riddled with high levels of complexity, uncertainty, and conflict, so-called “messes” or “wicked problems.” The realization that there is a need to consider a wide variety of values, knowledge, and perspectives in a collaborative decision making process has led to a multitude of new methods and processes being proposed to aid water planning and management, which include participatory forms of modeling, planning, and decision aiding processes. However, despite extensive scientific discussions, scholars have largely been unable to provide satisfactory responses to two pivotal questions: (1) What are the benefits of using participatory approaches?; (2) How exactly... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed article |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive management; Collaborative decision making; Evaluation; Interactive planning; Participatory modeling; Participatory research; Process design; Public participation; Social learning; Stakeholder participation; Water resources management. |
| Ano: 2012 |
|
| |
|
|
| Dionnet, Mathieu; Lisode; mathieu.dionnet@lisode.com; Daniell, Katherine A; Centre for Policy Innovation, The Australian National University; katherine.daniell@anu.edu.au; Imache, Amar; Lisode; amar.imache@lisode.com; von Korff, Yorck; Lisode; yorck.von-korff@lisode.com; Bouarfa, Sami; UMR G-EAU, Cemagref; sami.bouarfa@cemagref.fr; Garin, Patrice; UMR G-EAU, Cemagref; patrice.garin@cemagref.fr; Jamin, Jean-Yves; UMR G-EAU, CIRAD; jamin@cirad.fr; Rollin, Dominique; UMR G-EAU, Cemagref; dominique.rollin@cemagref.fr; Rougier, Jean-Emmanuel; Lisode; Jean-Emmanuel.Rougier@lisode.com. |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Community of practice; Natural resource management; Public participation; Role play; Simulation. |
| Ano: 2013 |
|
| |
|
|
| Monroe, Martha C.; School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida; mcmonroe@ufl.edu; Plate, Richard; School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida; richarp33@gmail.com; Oxarart, Annie; School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida; oxarart@ufl.edu. |
| Efforts to implement collaborative adaptive management (CAM) often suffer from challenges, such as an unwillingness of managers to share power, unresolved conflicts between stakeholders, and lack of capacity among stakeholders. Some aspects considered essential to CAM, e.g., trust and stakeholder capacity, may be more usefully viewed as goals for intermediate strategies rather than a set of initial conditions. From this perspective, intermediate steps that focus on social learning and building experience could overcome commonly cited barriers to CAM. An exploration of Springs Basin Working Groups, organized around major clusters of freshwater springs in north Florida, provides a case study of how these intermediate steps enable participants to become more... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Collaborative adaptive management; Florida USA; Public participation; Reasonable Person Model; Social learning; Stakeholder capacity. |
| Ano: 2013 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Druschke, Caroline Gottschalk; University of Rhode Island; cgd@uri.edu; Hychka, Kristen C.; U.S. EPA, Atlantic Ecology Division; khychka@gmail.com. |
| We look to a particular social-ecological system, the restoration community in Rhode Island, USA and the rivers, wetlands, marshes, and estuaries they work to protect, to draw connections between communication, community involvement, and ecological restoration project success. Offering real-world examples drawn from interviews with 27 local, state, federal, and nonprofit restoration managers, we synthesize the mechanisms that managers found effective to argue that the communication employed by resource managers in each phase of the restoration process, in prioritization, implementation, and monitoring, and for garnering broad-based support, shapes the quality of public engagement in natural resources management, which, in turn, can impact the stakeholder,... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Adaptive comanagement; Adaptive management; Communication; Discourse analysis; Natural resource management; Public engagement; Public participation; Restoration; River; Stakeholder engagement; Water. |
| Ano: 2015 |
|
| |
|
|
| Arnold, Jennifer S; School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Florida; jsarnold@ufl.edu; Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka; School of Human Development and Organizational Studies, University of Florida ; mirka@ufl.edu; Bartels, Wendy-Lin; Florida Climate Institute, University of Florida; wendylin@ufl.edu. |
| Adaptive collaborative management emphasizes stakeholder engagement as a crucial component of resilient social-ecological systems. Collaboration among diverse stakeholders is expected to enhance learning, build social legitimacy for decision making, and establish relationships that support learning and adaptation in the long term. However, simply bringing together diverse stakeholders does not guarantee productive engagement. Using critical discourse analysis, we examined how diverse stakeholders negotiated knowledge and power in a workshop designed to inform adaptive management of riparian livestock grazing on a National Forest in the southwestern USA. Publicly recognized as a successful component of a larger collaborative effort, we found that the... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Reports |
Palavras-chave: Collaboration; Conflict; Critical discourse analysis; Dialogue; Facilitation; Livestock grazing; Public participation; Riparian management social learning stakeholder engagement. |
| Ano: 2012 |
|
| |
|
|
| DeCaro, Daniel A.; Vincent and Elinor Ostrom Workshop in Political Theory & Policy Analysis, Indiana University; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville; Center for Land Use and Environmental Responsibility, University of Louisville; decaro.daniel@gmail.com; Stokes, Michael K.; Western Kentucky University; Micheal.Stokes@wku.edu. |
| Public participation plays a role in the development and long-term maintenance of environmental institutions that are well-matched to local social–ecological conditions. However, the means by which public participation impacts such institutional fit remains unclear. We argue that one major reason for this lack of clarity is that analysts have not clearly outlined how humankind’s sense of agency, or self-determination, influences institutional outcomes. Moreover, the concept of institutional fit is ambiguous as to what constitutes a good fit and how such fit could be diagnosed or improved. This is especially true for “social fit,” or how well institutions match human expectations and local behavioral patterns. We... |
| Tipo: Peer-Reviewed Synthesis |
Palavras-chave: Autonomy-support; Environmental management; Institutional fit; Procedural justice; Psychology; Public participation; Self-determination; Social acceptability; Social– Ecological systems; Sustainable development. |
| Ano: 2013 |
|
| |
|
|
| Beierle, Thomas C.. |
| This paper presents a framework for evaluating mechanisms that involve the public in environmental decision-making. These include traditional participatory mechanisms--such as public hearings, notice and comment procedures, and advisory committees--as well as those considered more innovative--such as regulatory negotiations, mediations, and citizen juries. The framework is based on a set of "social goals," defined as those goals which are valued outcomes of a participatory process, but which transcend the immediate interests of any party in that process. The goals are: educating the public, incorporating public values and knowledge into decision-making, building trust, reducing conflict, and assuring cost-effective decision-making. The paper begins with a... |
| Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper |
Palavras-chave: Public participation; Alternative dispute resolution; Consensus building; Public hearing; Advisory committee; Regulatory negotiation; Mediation; Evaluation; Trust; Social capital; Environmental Economics and Policy. |
| Ano: 1998 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/10497 |
| |
| Registros recuperados: 27 | |
|
|
|
